You're right. I guess it's just my preference that the embarrassment is not related to the size. Sorry about intervening with your tastes, everyone.LostBoy90 wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 5:14 am Everyone is welcome to an opinion. But I don’t understand how you call us out for discussing the kid being embarrassed about size then in the very next sentence talk about the kid being embarrassed. Speaking from experience boys are aware of size and there is nothing sexual about that. The embarrassment of being naked is all about exposing your most private area.
gritier142 wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 11:51 am Is that actually how you guys see these innocent CFNM situations? By how big or small someone's penis is and how embarrassing it is? You are forcing an adult-like sexual connotation in to these innocent embarrassing situations involving nudity. You do realize these kids don't think that at all?
CFNM SCENES.
-
gritier142
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2026 11:47 am
- Contact:
Re: CFNM SCENES.
-
Freesub
- Posts: 708
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:10 am
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 680 times
- Contact:
Re: CFNM SCENES.
Hey, it takes an honest man to recognise when he's wrong. I'm sure you'll find more embarassment up your alley earlier in the thread.gritier142 wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 1:54 pmYou're right. I guess it's just my preference that the embarrassment is not related to the size. Sorry about intervening with your tastes, everyone.LostBoy90 wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 5:14 am Everyone is welcome to an opinion. But I don’t understand how you call us out for discussing the kid being embarrassed about size then in the very next sentence talk about the kid being embarrassed. Speaking from experience boys are aware of size and there is nothing sexual about that. The embarrassment of being naked is all about exposing your most private area.
gritier142 wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 11:51 am Is that actually how you guys see these innocent CFNM situations? By how big or small someone's penis is and how embarrassing it is? You are forcing an adult-like sexual connotation in to these innocent embarrassing situations involving nudity. You do realize these kids don't think that at all?
Last edited by Freesub on Sun Mar 22, 2026 2:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
My real incidents:
viewtopic.php?t=3737
viewtopic.php?t=3840
viewtopic.php?t=3843
viewtopic.php?t=4002
viewtopic.php?t=3737
viewtopic.php?t=3840
viewtopic.php?t=3843
viewtopic.php?t=4002
-
dunbarbarian0
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2025 3:52 pm
- Been thanked: 34 times
- Contact:
Re: CFNM SCENES (Den Bästa Sommaren)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H1IzBf4JnQ
I admit that I have an unhealthy obsession with scenes in film that involved children having to take off their clothes, where the requirement for the film was that they had to be naked. This film has no such thing, but what strikes me as so odd is the two bath scenes in the film, and what's directly implied by them. The first one, very early in the film is linked above. There are two bath scenes like this in the film. There is no nudity in either of them because the scenes start after the girl is fully clothed and the boy has sat down in the bathtub, and they cut before the boy stands up.
Watching this out of context it seems like a father is supervising the bath of his two kids. The girl has gone first, has now put on clothes and dries her hair while the boy takes his bath. If the two tween-age kids were indeed brother and sister, I'd expect most would say they're a bit old to be bathed in each other's presence, let alone have their baths supervised by their father, but I suppose far from the most inappropriate thing imaginable. The true context of the film makes the reality, shall I say, interesting.
This is a foster family, and they've all just met each other the day before. They are getting to know each other, and since I expect most people here don't know Swedish, as he dries the boy's hair he asks the kids "so, what do you want to be when you grow up?" to which the girl replies "I want to be a prostitute!" which prompts the man's bewildered reaction. It's actually quite funny, as the scene goes on we learn she thinks that means you get paid to hug people, and the man tells her you have to do more than just hug people in that particular profession. It's a testament to the innocence of the children, but I'm digressing from that exact subject: this seems to depict them as unrealistically innocent.
Like I mentioned before, they are little kids, but they're getting big... big enough that they would naturally be uncomfortable bathing in the presence of an opposite sex kid or a man they just met the day before, in particular the girl! But they seem so unbothered by the whole thing. This was set in 1958 so I can imagine a scenario where there really was no choice but this setup, but I'm left thinking: what happened BEFORE the film cut to this scene? The girl would have been first to take off her clothes and take her bath. What, did the boy just sit back and... enjoy the view?? In this scene, the girl has something to do at least while the boy is in the bath.
I guess what strikes me as so odd about this scene, despite Sweden's relaxed attitude toward nudity in general, is how nonchalant everyone is about this arrangement. Specifically the two kids, but ESPECIALLY the girl. You can find the full movie online very easily, and I wish there was a way around it, but there are several points in the film where the girl is wearing a tight fitted shirt where you can clearly see her breasts are budding. Some might say that the kids are playing characters a couple years younger than the actors were, as is often the case, but the two kids in the film are confirmed to be 11 years old, which was around the actress Rebecca Scheja's age at the time of filming, while Anastasious Soulis would have been 12 going on 13. The girl is a bit of a tomboy, but it's difficult to believe she would have been comfortable being naked in a bathtub in front of a man and a boy her age who she just met the day before. It's never shown when they are told this will be the arrangement, there's no before and after leading up to it or away from it. It just happens, and the kids seem fine with it.
I get that the Swedes like going to the sauna, which I'm told is often co-ed all ages and naked, and in the context where it's totally appropriate to be naked when you're taking a bath I could see kids even on the cusp of puberty being comfortable being naked around each other despite having met the day before. That being said, there are a couple interesting things that seem to be contradictory, at least through the lens of my repressed culture that insists on equating nudity with being inherently sexual. In the middle of the film, the girl invites the boy into her bed (both fully clothed, it's completely innocent) and their foster father gently reprimands them the next morning, saying they shouldn't sleep in the same bed together.
Like, I get it, but first of all they're only 11... second of all, you're against the boy holding the girl while they sleep but you are completely fine with the two seeing each other's wet, naked bodies at bath time?
It's funny, later in the film there's a part where the two kids meet up with a black character they make friends with early in the film. He's kind of a running gag throughout the film because in 1958 Sweden there were very, very few black people living there. There's a point where he asks the boy when the girl is out of earshot "is she your girlfriend?" and the boy brushes it off (although you can tell he likes her) but I thought it'd be really funny if he replied to him "oh yeah, I see her naked all the time!"
There is also a part in the film where the kids are sent to bed early by their foster father and the boy puts on his pajamas in the corner behind the wall where the girl can't see his body. So, it's appropriate to be naked in front of each other in the bathing context but not when putting on sleepwear?
A couple final thoughts about this film. There's a part not long after the first bath scene where the man, who is an undertaker, has a coffin fall out of the back of the trunk of his car. The girl, who again is a bit of a tomboy, runs up and offers to help the man. The man says it's not typically a woman's job, but since the girl hasn't "blossomed" yet he can make an exception and call her in-between. When he says this, she briefly looks down and she might be looking at the coffin but I think she's taking a look at herself, knowing that he has recently had a close up view of her naked body.
What an odd thing to say to a tween girl you just saw naked for the first time the other day... and one thing that's uncomfortable to talk about but I have to mention is, the girl is indeed visibly 'blossoming' since that's the word we're using because her breast buds are noticeable with the shirt she's wearing. Perhaps the girl's vulva is still bald, but if that's the case and honestly what he's referring to, what an odd metric to determine if she is allowed to help lift a coffin and what an odd thing to point out, but here I am discussing these things openly.
https://m.ok.ru/video/5466294651578
I finally am just posting a link to the full movie. The first bath scene is at 13:55, the part where he comments that the girl hasn't blossomed yet is 19:25, the boy putting on his pajamas while the girl presumably waits her turn is at 31:40, the second bath scene is at 46:05, the part where they crawl into bed together is at 49:45.
What's funny is there likely was no nudity involved with the filming of either bath scene. I expect Anasatious Soulis simply was wearing a swimsuit in that bathtub, but that just goes to show that how comfortable these kids are depicted as with this whole arrangement seems very unrealistic, regardless of the setting, the culture, really any of the context. At the end of the second bath scene at 46:05, the man gets up and leaves the room as the two kids smile at each other. I'm curious what happened after he left, because the time has come for the boy to stand up and get a towel, which would expose his naked body to the girl's eyes. At this point in the film, they've gotten to know each other well so their relaxed attitude toward the whole thing is much more believable than the first scene, and it's entirely possible they had a mature arrangement set up where the clothed kid would turn around while the naked kid stood up until they had their underwear on, but again that makes me question what was the arrangement for when the girl was taking her bath while the boy waited his turn?
I've long wanted to write a story that addresses all these things, but for now I've gotten all this off my chest. It's funny how the 'CFNM' scene that has caught the most of my attention over the years doesn't ACTUALLY have any visible CFNM. It's all implied.
I admit that I have an unhealthy obsession with scenes in film that involved children having to take off their clothes, where the requirement for the film was that they had to be naked. This film has no such thing, but what strikes me as so odd is the two bath scenes in the film, and what's directly implied by them. The first one, very early in the film is linked above. There are two bath scenes like this in the film. There is no nudity in either of them because the scenes start after the girl is fully clothed and the boy has sat down in the bathtub, and they cut before the boy stands up.
Watching this out of context it seems like a father is supervising the bath of his two kids. The girl has gone first, has now put on clothes and dries her hair while the boy takes his bath. If the two tween-age kids were indeed brother and sister, I'd expect most would say they're a bit old to be bathed in each other's presence, let alone have their baths supervised by their father, but I suppose far from the most inappropriate thing imaginable. The true context of the film makes the reality, shall I say, interesting.
This is a foster family, and they've all just met each other the day before. They are getting to know each other, and since I expect most people here don't know Swedish, as he dries the boy's hair he asks the kids "so, what do you want to be when you grow up?" to which the girl replies "I want to be a prostitute!" which prompts the man's bewildered reaction. It's actually quite funny, as the scene goes on we learn she thinks that means you get paid to hug people, and the man tells her you have to do more than just hug people in that particular profession. It's a testament to the innocence of the children, but I'm digressing from that exact subject: this seems to depict them as unrealistically innocent.
Like I mentioned before, they are little kids, but they're getting big... big enough that they would naturally be uncomfortable bathing in the presence of an opposite sex kid or a man they just met the day before, in particular the girl! But they seem so unbothered by the whole thing. This was set in 1958 so I can imagine a scenario where there really was no choice but this setup, but I'm left thinking: what happened BEFORE the film cut to this scene? The girl would have been first to take off her clothes and take her bath. What, did the boy just sit back and... enjoy the view?? In this scene, the girl has something to do at least while the boy is in the bath.
I guess what strikes me as so odd about this scene, despite Sweden's relaxed attitude toward nudity in general, is how nonchalant everyone is about this arrangement. Specifically the two kids, but ESPECIALLY the girl. You can find the full movie online very easily, and I wish there was a way around it, but there are several points in the film where the girl is wearing a tight fitted shirt where you can clearly see her breasts are budding. Some might say that the kids are playing characters a couple years younger than the actors were, as is often the case, but the two kids in the film are confirmed to be 11 years old, which was around the actress Rebecca Scheja's age at the time of filming, while Anastasious Soulis would have been 12 going on 13. The girl is a bit of a tomboy, but it's difficult to believe she would have been comfortable being naked in a bathtub in front of a man and a boy her age who she just met the day before. It's never shown when they are told this will be the arrangement, there's no before and after leading up to it or away from it. It just happens, and the kids seem fine with it.
I get that the Swedes like going to the sauna, which I'm told is often co-ed all ages and naked, and in the context where it's totally appropriate to be naked when you're taking a bath I could see kids even on the cusp of puberty being comfortable being naked around each other despite having met the day before. That being said, there are a couple interesting things that seem to be contradictory, at least through the lens of my repressed culture that insists on equating nudity with being inherently sexual. In the middle of the film, the girl invites the boy into her bed (both fully clothed, it's completely innocent) and their foster father gently reprimands them the next morning, saying they shouldn't sleep in the same bed together.
Like, I get it, but first of all they're only 11... second of all, you're against the boy holding the girl while they sleep but you are completely fine with the two seeing each other's wet, naked bodies at bath time?
It's funny, later in the film there's a part where the two kids meet up with a black character they make friends with early in the film. He's kind of a running gag throughout the film because in 1958 Sweden there were very, very few black people living there. There's a point where he asks the boy when the girl is out of earshot "is she your girlfriend?" and the boy brushes it off (although you can tell he likes her) but I thought it'd be really funny if he replied to him "oh yeah, I see her naked all the time!"
There is also a part in the film where the kids are sent to bed early by their foster father and the boy puts on his pajamas in the corner behind the wall where the girl can't see his body. So, it's appropriate to be naked in front of each other in the bathing context but not when putting on sleepwear?
A couple final thoughts about this film. There's a part not long after the first bath scene where the man, who is an undertaker, has a coffin fall out of the back of the trunk of his car. The girl, who again is a bit of a tomboy, runs up and offers to help the man. The man says it's not typically a woman's job, but since the girl hasn't "blossomed" yet he can make an exception and call her in-between. When he says this, she briefly looks down and she might be looking at the coffin but I think she's taking a look at herself, knowing that he has recently had a close up view of her naked body.
What an odd thing to say to a tween girl you just saw naked for the first time the other day... and one thing that's uncomfortable to talk about but I have to mention is, the girl is indeed visibly 'blossoming' since that's the word we're using because her breast buds are noticeable with the shirt she's wearing. Perhaps the girl's vulva is still bald, but if that's the case and honestly what he's referring to, what an odd metric to determine if she is allowed to help lift a coffin and what an odd thing to point out, but here I am discussing these things openly.
https://m.ok.ru/video/5466294651578
I finally am just posting a link to the full movie. The first bath scene is at 13:55, the part where he comments that the girl hasn't blossomed yet is 19:25, the boy putting on his pajamas while the girl presumably waits her turn is at 31:40, the second bath scene is at 46:05, the part where they crawl into bed together is at 49:45.
What's funny is there likely was no nudity involved with the filming of either bath scene. I expect Anasatious Soulis simply was wearing a swimsuit in that bathtub, but that just goes to show that how comfortable these kids are depicted as with this whole arrangement seems very unrealistic, regardless of the setting, the culture, really any of the context. At the end of the second bath scene at 46:05, the man gets up and leaves the room as the two kids smile at each other. I'm curious what happened after he left, because the time has come for the boy to stand up and get a towel, which would expose his naked body to the girl's eyes. At this point in the film, they've gotten to know each other well so their relaxed attitude toward the whole thing is much more believable than the first scene, and it's entirely possible they had a mature arrangement set up where the clothed kid would turn around while the naked kid stood up until they had their underwear on, but again that makes me question what was the arrangement for when the girl was taking her bath while the boy waited his turn?
I've long wanted to write a story that addresses all these things, but for now I've gotten all this off my chest. It's funny how the 'CFNM' scene that has caught the most of my attention over the years doesn't ACTUALLY have any visible CFNM. It's all implied.
Re: CFNM SCENES.
Well there has been plenty of movies where the actors and actresses do see eachother naked then film other scenes like nothing happened. I wonder how they feel
-
NickTwisp
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2025 4:57 am
- Has thanked: 454 times
- Been thanked: 634 times
- Contact:
Re: CFNM SCENES.
As soon as I see it's a youtube link I know that no actual genitals will be visible. Exceptions are medical films such as examination for testicular abnormalities. Any full-frontal nudity on that forum has to be implied or blurred out.
There is a 1952 Boys Hygiene film on youtube which shows the 17-year-old subject taking a shower. Very briefly, his rear end is shown. That video has an "Adult Content Warning" tacked onto the description and it came close to being taken down just because his ass is shown for a few seconds.
There is a 1952 Boys Hygiene film on youtube which shows the 17-year-old subject taking a shower. Very briefly, his rear end is shown. That video has an "Adult Content Warning" tacked onto the description and it came close to being taken down just because his ass is shown for a few seconds.
Re: CFNM SCENES.
https://archive.org/details/bQ0tpZZVNEF ... 1pfWjqo9c0
The link for the above mentioned boys hygiene film...
They show his ass around 2:08... It's shown just for 3 seconds
The link for the above mentioned boys hygiene film...
They show his ass around 2:08... It's shown just for 3 seconds
-
Freesub
- Posts: 708
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:10 am
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 680 times
- Contact:
Re: CFNM SCENES.
I would understand the warning if they showed his penis, but just for his ass is kind of ridiculousNickTwisp wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2026 4:35 am As soon as I see it's a youtube link I know that no actual genitals will be visible. Exceptions are medical films such as examination for testicular abnormalities. Any full-frontal nudity on that forum has to be implied or blurred out.
There is a 1952 Boys Hygiene film on youtube which shows the 17-year-old subject taking a shower. Very briefly, his rear end is shown. That video has an "Adult Content Warning" tacked onto the description and it came close to being taken down just because his ass is shown for a few seconds.
My real incidents:
viewtopic.php?t=3737
viewtopic.php?t=3840
viewtopic.php?t=3843
viewtopic.php?t=4002
viewtopic.php?t=3737
viewtopic.php?t=3840
viewtopic.php?t=3843
viewtopic.php?t=4002
-
NickTwisp
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2025 4:57 am
- Has thanked: 454 times
- Been thanked: 634 times
- Contact:
Re: Re: CFNM SCENES.
The other fun portion of that film is when Larry is in the locker room talking about always wearing sandals to protect against getting Athletes Foot. At some point a random (good looking) fellow teen casually strolls through the camera range wearing just underpants (white briefs).
Don't know if the filmmakers did that intentionally or not? The film was intended to be shown in male only classes I would imagine.
Don't know if the filmmakers did that intentionally or not? The film was intended to be shown in male only classes I would imagine.
-
Happy Eastermann
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2026 4:19 pm
- Been thanked: 4 times
- Contact:
Re: CFNM SCENES.
It is not sure that the movie was designed to be shown only in boys classes, it could be shown also in girls classes to learn them how their future sons might wash ansd I presume in mixed classes ?
-
bingerbonger
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2026 9:45 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 56 times
- Contact:
Re: CFNM SCENES.
I get a ton of stuff like this on my private insta feed but they're mostly girls tho. If anyone is interested tho lmk we can send each other reelsChotanunnu wrote: Sun Feb 22, 2026 9:12 pmAny more links you have did you save itMattheus wrote: Sun Feb 22, 2026 7:17 amIts gone, here something else that just popped up lol, there are plenty, India is like a daily source of boys humiliationIseekandwonder22 wrote: Fri Feb 20, 2026 4:28 pm
The Instagram police struck or just me but link doesn't work anymore
Anyone have it saved
Or more like this
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVA578TE ... YwaXNrbzd0
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bronzeorifice and 10 guests