CFNM SCENES.

[don12341234]

Some great content, shame there’s not much of younger boys in a naked situation. Needs to be more forced stripping of boys by bullies(male or female) and not just a towel or trunks taken off in a changing room scenario.

Plus if the user who mentioned a group on telegram reads this , is the group still active and could I get the details so I could join please ?

Text me your telegram account

I've texted u my telegram account as well.. so if there's any group add me as well

Can you give me your Telegram account? We can exchange videos.

[don12341234]

Some great content, shame there’s not much of younger boys in a naked situation. Needs to be more forced stripping of boys by bullies(male or female) and not just a towel or trunks taken off in a changing room scenario.

Plus if the user who mentioned a group on telegram reads this , is the group still active and could I get the details so I could join please ?

Text me your telegram account

Jackal I’ve messaged you with my telegram account, have you found me on there yet?

Can you give me your Telegram account? We can exchange videos.

[Jackal001]

Text me your telegram account

Jackal I’ve messaged you with my telegram account, have you found me on there yet?

Can you give me your Telegram account? We can exchange videos.

I have sent you a message

[Kdog]

Anyone got telegram accounts that they would like to share stuff?

[Tony2]

Anyone got any idea what's going on here?

So many pretty much bare butts. Mostly men and boys. Looks like some kind of festival or tradition???

https://m.facebook.com/lovelykumachan/reels/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadaka_Matsuri

[dunbarbarian0]

Ya Rodom Iz Destva (Soviet Union, 1966) - English Translation: 'I Come From My Childhood'

20:50 timestamp, the Soviet family of 4 is finally reunited in Belarus after World War 2, and the father decides to bond with his children (a boy roughly 13-14, and a girl maybe 6-7) in an intimate, hands on way. He takes them to a rigged up shower, and bathes his children while the mother looks on while folding clothes and loving every second of this reunion between her children and their father. The father keeps his shorts on, while both the kids are naked.

I love this scene. You can feel the relief they all feel that everyone is still alive and how thankful they are to be together again. It is very telling that the very first order the father gives his children upon reuniting with them is to come to the shower with him. It isn't directly said but it's clear as day. While the goal on the surface of this order is to bathe his children and get them clean as a whistle, there is obviously a primal ulterior motive: providing them direct skin-to-skin physical affection. Sure, he washes his kids and that's great, but it's really not the point. The father is killing two birds with one stone here. The outdoor shower being a perfect excuse for the man to figuratively shower his children with his love and affection, through his open hands directly caressing soap onto their skin.

So much love is in the air, and even the boy at his age is a willing participant. Fully capable of washing himself, again: that just isn't the point here. It might not be verbally acknowledged and it doesn't need to be. The actions acknowledge it. The newly fledged teenage boy goes with his father directly to the shower, takes off all his clothes, and eagerly waits his turn to be doted on by his father while the father is attending to his little sister. You get the feeling watching the boy throughout the scene that his father's physical affection is something he has been starving for. It might come off as invasive, but trust me if you watch it you'll see it is the exact opposite. The boy can't get his dad's hands on him fast enough. He blatantly wants to be loved on by his dad. He NEEDS to feel his father's hands on his skin after so long... and that's exactly why they are there together in the shower. The father not only recognizes this need, but clearly by taking his kids directly to the shower it shows that he has his own need to physically love on his boy and his little girl. He is himself desperate to put his hands on his son and make him feel truly safe for the first time in years... to slide his hands across his upper body and send love from his fingers directly into his boy's soul. The man wastes no time in fulfilling something he clearly sees as his fatherly duty, having lost so much precious time with his kids, and takes them somewhere where he can touch them. Somewhere he can touch them intimately, directly on their skin, so they are able to feel his love.

The perfect excuse to make this touch functional and without any shame is to use his hands to lather soap onto their naked bodies, simultaneously getting them all clean while also flooding their brains with oxytocin, serotonin, dopamine, and endorphins. The shower is an alibi for the man to provide physical affection to his children, bathing them is camoflouge for caressing them, feeling their heartbeat and their breathing, evidence that they are alive and well. There is no shame in any of it. It's exactly what you would want, what you would need, after being separated for so long in this context. As the child: to be touched by your father, and as the father: to touch your child, with direct and intimate open hand skin-to skin contact. The perfect place to do this is a shower, and the father appears to direct it in stages.

While the boy is getting his hair and body all wet under the shower head, the father is attending to the young girl by washing and rinsing her hair. As he positions her underneath the shower head, probably my favorite part of the whole scene occurs: the boy, now dripping wet, puts two hands on a stool and positions himself so the father can wash his back. He welcomes his father's meticulous touch in full. This feels like a regression as a result of trauma experienced from the war. This isn't a little boy, as much as he is ok with being treated like one on this occasion, not even a tween. He's still boyish with smooth looking skin, but he's getting to be his dad's height and I'd venture to guess he's got more hair on his body than what's on his head at this point, although that can't be confirmed the way the boy is filmed during the scene. I'll come to that later. For now, the point is: he's at least 13, maybe 14, and when he assumes this submissive position with both hands on the stool it shows he is even more than a willing participant: he is eager for his father to do this. He was very much looking forward to it. Again, probably starving for it. He puts his two hands on the stool as the father puts the girl under the showerhead, silently saying "ok dad, my turn, get on with it!" ready for his father to wash his back and feel those paternal hands on his skin after years of separation, and it may be just me but when his father takes his hands off him, the boy immediately looks to his father as if silently asking "why did you stop?? Dad, get back here and do your job!! We got lost time to make up for!" It's such a lovely thing to see from a boy his age, to be so welcome to his dad actively bathing him, even just his back, completely shameless about the whole thing and rightfully so. It shows how much he missed him and how relieved he is that his dad is alive, and how much he loves to be touched by him. It almost seems like he's holding his dad accountable to do his job in this situation as much as the father holds himself accountable for the same thing! It's funny to think about the dad giving the order for the kids to come to the shower with him. This boy probably thought 'you are quite mistaken, sir, it is you who is coming now to the shower with me, just to be clear.' Either way, you can tell the dad is enthusiastic about providing the skin-to-skin physical affection his son has been looking forward to.

If that part is not my favorite part of the scene, the next part is because the dad then gives his son the soap and allows the boy to return the favor, which he does fastidiously before the little sister joins in. This part the mother especially loves, and I don't blame her.

At the end of the scene, the father washes his boy some more now standing up under the showerhead before he then allows his son to reciprocate while the girl attends to herself. Earlier in the scene the girl had wrapped herself in a towel but clearly she opted to stick around. You can imagine all parties wanted to extend the shower as long as it could be extended. In the shower it is ok for the father to get physical and be liberal about putting his hands on them. Meanwhile, the kids are safe to experience the love of their father expressed with his hands rubbing soap on them and stroking their bare skin. That's why I love the scene so much: it feels so safe. It's such a humorous juxtaposition to me that the kids are completely naked, but it's no doubt the safest they've felt in 4 years.

Now to transition from the characters to the actors. I admit it, it's not quite CFNM, but the interesting element of this scene is the early-teenage boy. Both the kids, him and his little sister, are naked for the scene while the father wears shorts. I don't know if this would be normal in the Soviet Union in this type of situation or if it was more due to Soviet film censorhip guidelines at the time, but for whatever reason it was ok for the kids to be naked and not ok for the dad to be naked in this scene. You can clearly see full frontal nudity of the girl throughout the scene, and extensive rear nudity of the boy but you never see his penis unobstructed. I guess he was old enough that he could be filmed naked but full frontal nudity had to be obscured or had to be kept brief. If the director intended to film the young man's full frontal nudity, his penis would have been clearly visible throughout the scene like the girl's vulva is. There is some careful, impressive camerawork to make sure his frontal nudity remains covered or at least obscured, but when the boy stands sideways to the camera there are a couple moments where you can see the head of his penis briefly visible. Also, when the boy willingly submits to his father washing his back, his arm is placed in the perfect spot where it covers his genitals. However, at timestamp 21:20 the boy moves his arm up which briefly reveals his genitals to the camera, still slightly obscured even in the 4k restoration. His scrotum is pretty easily discernable, but the shaft and head of his penis not so much before the camera makes an adjustment that was probably a conscious response to the boy moving his arm. Also, at timestamp 21:31 when the boy reciprocates and washes his father's back, he does so with enthusiasm and makes a few small pelvic thrusts. You can tell the intention was for the bucket of water to protect the boy's modesty, but his scrubbing motion briefly reveals his penis bobbing around as a result of his movement, although you never get a clear unobstructed look. Clever camerawork, although not entirely successful.

Perhaps it was both a result of Soviet censorship guidelines but also out of the director's concern for the boy's modesty! It's unclear if the boy openly expressed his anxiety about this scene upon learning he was going to have to be completely naked or did his very best to pretend it wasn't a big deal to him. It simply must have been a very big deal. They are not all alike, but I have been a 13 year old boy and let me tell you with certainty: this scene placed a heavy burden upon this young man. The director surely knew the kid had to exhibit significant stoicism and bravery to stand completely naked, dripping wet and have his growing penis seen by all the other actors playing his family and all the crew that was present for filming of this scene while forcing down his natural feelings of modesty to act as this man's son as and as if nobody else could see his naked body while the camera was rolling. The poor boy had to have known in advance that everyone on the set for the filming of that scene was going to see him completely naked... oh and to put dramatic emphasis on the most blatantly obvious but maybe even the worst part of all for him: a large video camera was going to be filming his completely naked body while he had to willingly submit to a large half-naked man dominating him with a younger naked girl walking around the scene, all the while having to pretend that she is his little sister and that the man is his doting father and that this shower is something that his character is not only willing to submit to with no sign of embarrassment, but something his character has been eagerly looking forward to! It puts a pit in my stomach just typing about it. I literally blush for this boy who went through this 6 decades ago, when my own parents were younger than him. The more I type about it, the less surprised I am the kid didn't pursue acting as a career despite clearly having a talent for it.

I wonder if he director might have just been sparing him having to fully bare his genitals in front of every single person that ever saw the movie, knowing the boy was being very brave to take on the vulnerability required of him and baring his genitals to film this scene. He probably realized this boy would have to go back to school and deal with teasing that likely resulted from his peers... that he would have to look the girls in the eye. While the camera was recording he would have had to have fought the immense acute anxiety he must have experienced and keep his hands from covering himself, leaving his naked body fully exposed the whole time the scene was being filmed at a very, VERY sensitive age in his life when self-consciousness and body awareness are at their very highest points for most adolescent boys. Perhaps the director was at least doing his best to film the scene in a way that made sure that while the audience would see his naked body, they wouldn't get a good look between his legs out of respect for his bravery and his modesty. This had to have very stressful for the poor kid. I mean, imagine being 13 and being informed that you are going to be filmed completely naked in an outdoor shower.

It could absolutely not have been me, let me tell you that.

I have to admire the boy specifically. Viktor Kolodkin is his name. Roughly 13 years of age judging by the look of him, 60 years later it's entirely possible he is still with us. I am dying to know his retrospective on filming this scene. This was the only film the boy ever made, and the only thing on his biography is he eventually became a mechanical engineer! The girl looks too young to be very concerned with being naked in this scene, but it certainly would have been concerning to Viktor. He was in a uniquely disadvantageous position for this scene. He would have carried a sense of modesty, and not only had to appear naked in this scene but his wet, naked body in the early stages of puberty was seen in full by an also naked young girl, by a hulking man who had shorts on, and likely by the actress playing the mother although it's entirely possible the actress was not present based on the way it's shot. But the crew and director would also have seen the boy completely naked and all wet. All sets of eyes behind the camera would have seen the boy's completely naked body and the boy had to act like he was this man's son and very much looking forward to feeling his hands on his bare back, and pretend that he didn't mind being naked in a shower in front of a naked little girl who was not actually related to him, at 13-14 years of age no doubt experiencing all sorts of hormones and hair growing in places it wasn't before, while submitting to the man he had to pretend was his father putting his hands on him and lathering soap onto his naked body. What a brave kid.

None of these actors playing his family are actually family members. They are all acting. The biggest challenge of this scene by far fell upon the boy, and he does such a magnificent job acting like a willing participant as a member of this family in this context when the reality is it probably made him feel very vulnerable and likely caused him significant anxiety leading up to the filming from the moment he found out the reality of what would be required of him while filming this scene. I know I'm being redundant but the crazy thing is he not only had to act nonchalant about being naked for this, but he had to act like this was something he was eager to submit to. You really believe this kid is eager to have his father wash his back. You can feel his disappointment when his father takes his hands off him, immediately looking to him for more. Very impressive considering the acute stress he must have been experiencing as the actor... stress he had to repress in order to convincingly play his character.

I am happy he took it on the chin and did it, assuming he even was that apprehensive about it. The scene feels so warm because the father does appear to be fulfilling something he considers to be his parental fatherly duty, particularly toward his son, who welcomes it entirely despite his age. The father is so loving and the kids, especially the boy, are so willing and eager for him to bathe them and to feel his hands directly on their skin caressing them. It's very calming to witness.

The 1080p black and white version can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3dQ7VFcmo4

The 4k color restoration can be found here: https://ok.ru/video/5497654414007

[TeenFan]

In this Soviet film, they might have shot the scene numerous times over the course of ten to twenty minutes. Then in editing the moments
where the boy isn't "overly" exposed are used. It is unlikely any women are part of the film crew.

Make the girl being washed 10 to 12 years old and that boy might have been much more concerned about the extended nude scene.

This was probably common bathing for 1940s-50s Soviet Union, especially the people from villages. Indoor plumbing would have been rare.

[dunbarbarian0]

In this Soviet film, they might have shot the scene numerous times over the course of ten to twenty minutes. Then in editing the moments
where the boy isn't "overly" exposed are used. It is unlikely any women are part of the film crew.

Make the girl being washed 10 to 12 years old and that boy might have been much more concerned about the extended nude scene.

This was probably common bathing for 1940s-50s Soviet Union, especially the people from villages. Indoor plumbing would have been rare.

So basically tell the dad to bathe the kids and be candid, tell the kids to obey him and welcome the touch as if he’s his dad, and just record a bunch of footage over an extended period and decide on the best of it when editing the film, trying to keep the boy’s genitals out of full view for more than a couple seconds? I could see it. I don’t know how the process of making films even goes but there is something that seems candid and unscripted about this part. Director might have just told the guy to improvise and the kiddos to follow his lead.

Goodness gracious, make the girl a tween?? To say that would change the dynamic is an understatement, for both kids! The little girl probably took a few curious looks at her “big brother’s” penis while filming this scene that were totally innocent. I’d guess he probably had some hair that would have caught her attention, couldn’t have helped the stress the boy was feeling having her eyes on him although it’s not likely a girl of that age meant anything malicious by looking which he probably knew.

Make the girl 10-12… there’s three things going on here. The boy would want to see her naked, the girl would want to see him naked, and they both would be anxious about being seen by the other!

It’s not guaranteed but let’s say at this age the girl’s breasts had visibly begun budding while her vulva was still bald as a baby. Would Soviet censorship have allowed the girl’s full frontal nudity to be filmed? I talk about the bravery of the boy while filming this scene, in this case the heaviest burden would fall upon the girl having to be naked in a shower while being dominated by a hulking half naked man she had to pretend to be her father while in the presence of a slightly older naked boy in the early stages of puberty himself who she had to pretend was her brother.

The boy’s hormones would be raging. The intimacy of the skin to skin contact and the close quarters combined with the sight of the girl’s wet developing naked body would potentially (surely) result in the boy’s arousal. Not to mention he would feel her eyes on him. I have a feeling he would have more of an obligation not to look at her while she wouldn’t be reprimanded the same way for openly staring between his legs.

I don’t think it could happen like that. Parents would have to consent, both the kids would have to keep their cool. The tension would be massive, and I wonder what the censors would have to say about it. You put naked tween/early teen kids in a shower together like that and you can guess what will happen. I don’t think it’s even realistic the father would take both those kids in the shower together if that was the age difference. He might take care of one first and then the other. I understand these kids are traumatized and so is the father, but would it even be appropriate or well received by the girl for the father to intimately bathe her like this scene after her breasts have begun to grow?

[saxo2000]

https://m.my.mail.ru/xmail.ru/williamrg ... deo/2.html

The woman's voice seems pretty amused by the lad getting pantsed, unfortunately for him she flicks the camera at the right time to perfectly record his naked boyhood

did anyone save this? nothing loads for me but maybe I have to create a login

[dunbarbarian0]

Macbeth (1971)

Macduff’s son, played by Mark Dightam, stands in the tub while being bathed by Lady Macduff. He looks to be 10-11 years old, maybe 12, but fully prepubescent. Full frontal nudity, and rear nudity as the scene progresses. Very interesting capture of the realism of how this would go in medieval times. He’d stand up, sit down, stand up, whatever his mother ordered while she went to town on him. You wonder what was going through the actor’s head in advance of having to film this and how stressed he was standing naked in front of the woman while his naked body was being filmed. There definitely was some bravery required of him.

I don’t like that it was Roman Polanski behind the camera who likely was the one who insisted on this, but I did find out this was filmed right after his pregnant wife Sharon Tate was murdered by the Manson family. You can sense that the cherubic naked boy in this scene, before it delves into a very disturbing and upsetting home invasion scene, is a symbol of raw vulnerability.

I found out the scene is directly out of not only Polanski’s psyche, but his own experience. Here is some trivia I found on the IMDb page

‘When crew members suggested to Roman Polanski that perhaps the film was too unrealistically gory for its own good, Polanski reportedly replied, "I know violence. You should've seen my house last summer."’

‘The scene in which Macbeth's thugs massacre Macduff's household was based on Roman Polanski's memory of SS officers ransacking his house as a child.’ You wonder if he himself was getting out of the tub when it happened.

‘Mark Dightam, who was eleven when he controversially appeared full frontally naked as MacDuff's son, was not allowed to see the film when it was released because it had been classified AA and he was under 14 at the time.’ I don’t think this was actually that controversial, largely because everyone was up in arms that the film depicted Francesca Annis totally naked. If it were filmed today, it would surely be the opposite.

Finally, the most eerie and grim piece of trivia I found that truly sends shivers down my spine: ‘ During the set up of the gruesome death scene of Lady MacDuff's children, director Roman Polanski was instructing a four-year-old blonde girl on how to play dead, while smearing fake blood all over her body. Polanski playfully asked the girl what her name was, to which she replied "Sharon."’

1:38:55, link to 1080p criterion restoration below. Content warning, it starts off cozy and homey but for those unfamiliar with the play, what happens after the boy steps out of the tub is extremely upsetting.

https://ok.ru/video/7684966976010